Industrial Update 2012 – Published in Western Real Estate Business
Southern California focuses on Its lack of space, while San Francisco’s tech boom buoys its East Bay industrial submarket
The Resurgence of Manufacturing in Southern California Will Produce More Deals
As the economy continues to recover, so will Southern California’s commercial real estate market. In fact, we have already seen signs of some recovery in certain sectors. The fact that virtually no new construction has taken place in the past several years will help improve the overall market as vacancies continue to decrease. One of the sectors that seems to be thriving is the industrial market for larger industrial and manufacturing facilities. This is due, in part, to a
limited supply. It is also due to the corporations that are now in growth mode after years of reductions and consolidations.
Southern California’s geography, particularly in Los Angeles and Orange County, also provides for a limited amount of opportunities to build new larger industrial and manufacturing facilities. This fact, combined with the number of older buildings that are now deemed inefficient by today’s standards (many do not provide adequate power requirements, ceiling height, loading capacity or functionality), makes many of the region’s vacant spaces obsolete and not realistic options for prospective tenants.
The overall available space for larger big box industrial and manufacturing facilities in Los Angeles and Orange County is extremely limited. Estimates have put vacancy at 1 percent to 3 percent in this region. While the vacancy in the overall market may be as much as 10 percent to 15 percent, these specific submarkets have limited opportunities. A few of the other markets throughout Southern California, such as the Inland Empire and parts of San Diego County, have higher vacancies. However, the amount of vacancies for these bigger buildings has dropped dramatically over the past 18 months.
During the economic downturn, many of the smaller, entrepreneurial manufacturing companies based in Southern California either went out of business, were acquired by larger companies or elected to relocate out of the area due to the high cost of doing business in this region. Those companies, which did not have to be in Southern California, found opportunities either overseas, in Mexico or other Western states that were significantly cheaper than this area.
The companies that stayed and are in older and/or inefficient buildings now have an opportunity to take advantage of the real estate market while rates are at am all-time low. In the leasing sector, concessions like tenant improvements, free rent and lower rental rates provide an additional incentive for a tenant to relocate. Many manufacturing companies have significant upfront expenses to relocate equipment and make the necessary improvements for their businesses. These upfront concessions provide the user with the opportunity to defray these initial relocation costs. Being located in a more efficient and/or newer building makes these businesses more profitable and efficient.
The benefits to a landlord of renting to a manufacturing company are twofold. The manufacturing company will typically be in a position to pay a higher rental rate, while a manufacturing company will be interested in signing a longer-term lease (i.e. 10 to 15 years, as opposed to a distribution company that typically looks for a three- to five-year lease). The upfront costs and disruptions to relocate a manufacturing company make relocation a rare event. Distribution companies will have more opportunities for changes in their business and spatial requirements and may not want to be locked into a longer-term lease. A landlord who is looking for long-term cash flow may want to consider renting to a manufacturing company rather than having to re-lease the building every few years.
As the real estate market continues to recover, it will present new challenges and nuances both for landlords and tenants as they try to find the right partners to structure mutually beneficial transactions. Tenants that are consolidating or relocating should utilize professionals and consultants to help them assess relocation costs and structure a transaction that accommodates their business requirements. Savvy tenants will be able to take advantage of the market and will benefit from a new and hopefully more efficient facility while prices are still on the lower end of the spectrum.
- Published in Real Estate
Industrial Update 2011 – Published in Western Real Estate Business
Industrial Real Estate and Its Strong Airport Ties
Today, many generally Perceive our economy and the real estate markets
as a continual struggle. However, there are silver linings in various submarkets throughout the Westen U.S. that appear to have weathered the storm, gotten onto a road of recovery and provided greater opportunities for investors and landlords.
When it comes to the West, the industrial real estate markets; which are tied to distribution, trucking and shipping, are in far better shape than those that have no tie to industry, workforce or amenities.
A prime example is the industrial submarkets in Los Angeles County, which are in close proximity to LAX Airport and to the Port of Los Angeles. While Southern California is the most dynamic and largest real estate market in the West, it is also composed of numerous micro-submarkets. The industrial submarket surrounding LAX has a vacancy rate that is significantly less than that of the overall marketplace.
While many of the buildings in this submarket are older and less efficient,
the lack of available real estate and the necessity for those companies to be near the airport make them extremely more desirable than those in other submarkets. This is especially true when you consider the airport submarket’s ease of access, the current costs of labor, gas and transportation and the major congestion along most Southern California freeways.
This desirability extends just south of the airport to the South Bay’s industrial submarket. In this region industrial facilities located near the Port of Los Angeles are in high demand. Many businesses that are tied to the materials and goods that arrive through the port cannot afford to be located farther away from their drop point. The additional costs in mileage, as well as the expected time
delays, make it much more difficult and expensive to operate farther away from the port” Additionally, many of the third-party logistics companies have been in growth mode as more and more corporations look to outsource these functions and cut costs. This has caused increased demand in that submarket, and has buoyed the
rental rates.
The same concept holds true for a few of Southern California’s other
metro areas, such as Burbank, San Diego and Ontario – all of which have
airports. The industrial submarkets within close proximity to these airports have lower vacancies and higher rental rates than those located farther
away. Clearly, the concept of “location, location, location” adds significantly
to a property’s value. This has been proven true even during struggling real estate markets.
Aside from location, there are many other amenities inherent to airport hubs that provide additional incentives for tenants, Corporate executives visiting one of their Southern California-based facilities will typically desire amenities like hotels, restaurants, fitness centers, etc. The submarkets surrounding the airport areas tend to have a greater depth of options than its outlying areas.
This is true in other Western markets like Seattle, Phoenix and Las Vegas as well. With increased pressure to control operating costs and to provide efficiencies in delivery methods and operations, companies will look to facilities that allow them
efficiencies and cost savings. It is for that reason that you see these specific
submarkets in the major metro areas continue to hold their grounds even through these difficult times.
- Published in Real Estate
The Key to Positive Tenant Relations – Published in REBUSINESS ONLINE
In todayâs difficult economic times, it is important for management companies and owners of multifamily and commercial real estate to look for ways to trim expenses, maintain cash flow and survive until the markets can improve. It is safe to say that every company whether directly related to the real estate industry or not, has been and is in the process of continuing to run as lean and mean as possible. These moves include personnel changes and lay-offs, consolidations, revamping of expenses and compensation structures. Once a company has finished with its âtightening of the belt,â the only way for the firm to continue to be successful going forward is to maintain positive client relations and maintain occupancy levels to keep its properties full.
There is no question that whether you own an apartment building, industrial complex or
an office building the name of the game in todayâs environment is to A) keep your property full, (B) to work with your existing tenants as best you can and (C) try to attract new tenants to fill your vacancies. It is for these reasons that the single most important focus of a property owner or a management company is to look at the properties existing tenant base and ensure that your managers are doing whatever they can to maintain and improve their tenant relations.
When it comes time to discuss lease renewals or your tenantâs financial ability to pay, the initial reaction of a tenant is to focus on all the negatives associated with their living or working environment. Tenants donât forget the leaky roof, the running toilet, the air conditioner that broke in the middle of summer or any of the inconveniences that are beyond the control of a property owner, but nonetheless, become the ownerâs legacy and misfortune to deal with. Tenants donât seem to remember how quickly you rushed out to fix those problems or how much money it had cost to clean them up or the extra expense that you incurred to do the work after hours so as not to disrupt their world any more than need be. In addition, tenants donât seem to remember the late night phone calls and expect and demand that their property management issues always float to the top of the list and should be more important than others. With that said, they are the customer and it is your job as the manager/owner to ensure that you have good customer relations whatever that takes (within reason). For this reason, when the lease renewal comes up, instead of using all of the negative items from the past, the conversation takes a completely different tone and now focuses on the tenantâs business or financial condition and their ability to pay going forward.
Everyone wants to talk about how soft the real estate market is and how they should
receive a discount as a result of that. There is no argument by any owner or management
company that the real estate market is soft nor does it require much discussion to agree with
your tenant. But that is not the crux of the conversation. The conversation as a concerned
property manager and owner is that you have a viable tenant that can afford the rent on the
property and that they will be there to pay in a timely fashion in the future.
The second key in maintaining good tenant relations is to make sure you are constantly
in communication with your customer. Whether that involves newsletters, email notices and
updates as it relates to their occupancy, or cards, thank you letters or best wishes for the
holidays. Believe it or not, those items go a long way towards establishing a positive working
relationship. If the tenant does not have the desire or need for communication back, it is
important for the property manager or owner to be proactive in establishing and continuing this working relationship. Chocolates on Valentineâs Day, a holiday card for the New Year or even a simple visit by the management or owner to check in on their tenant and make sure everything is okay, are the basic steps which must be taken.
Knowledge is key in any negotiation and understanding the goals and objectives of the
person or entity on the other side of the negotiating table is paramount in structuring a âwin-winâ conversation or transaction. Without good tenant relations and customer service, you as the property owner or management, automatically put yourself at a deficiency or run the risk of jeopardizing your future relationship with your tenant. Being an informed, proactive, concerned and educated landlord will ease the strain of todayâs economy and produce better tenant relationships in the long run.
- Published in Real Estate
The importance of tenant relations today, tomorrow and into the future – Published in San Diego Source l The Daily Transcript
In todayâs difficult economic times and challenging real estate markets for both residential and commercial real estate throughout the country, it is important for management companies and owners of multifamily and commercial real estate to look for ways to trim expenses, maintain cash flow and survive until the markets can improve. It is safe to say that every company, whether directly related to the real estate industry or not, has been and is in the process of continuing to run as lean and mean as possible. These moves include personnel changes and lay-offs, consolidations, revamping of expenses and compensation structures. Once a company has finished with its âtightening of the belt,â the only way for the firm to continue to be successful going forward is to maintain positive client relations and maintain occupancy levels to keep its properties full.
There is no question that whether you own an apartment building, industrial complex or office building, the name of the game in todayâs environment is to: keep your property full, work with your existing tenants as best you can and try to attract new tenants to fill your vacancies. It is for these reasons that the single most important focus of a property owner or a management company is to look at the propertyâs existing tenant base and ensure your managers are doing whatever they can to maintain and improve their tenant relations.
Remember, tenants never forget. When it comes time to discuss their lease or their financial ability to pay, the initial reaction of a tenant is to focus on all the negatives associated with their living or working environment. Tenants donât forget the leaky roof, the running toilet, the air conditioner that broke in the middle of summer or any of the inconveniences that are beyond the control of a property owner, but nonetheless, become the ownerâs legacy and misfortune to deal with. Tenants donât seem toremember how quickly you rushed out to fix those problems, how much money it cost to clean them up or the extra expense that you incurred to do the work after hours so as not to disrupt their world anymore than need be. In addition, tenants donât seem to remember the late night phone calls and expect and demand that their property management issues always float to the top of the list and should be more important than others. With that said, they are the customer, and it is your job as the manager/owner to ensure you have good customer relations.
For this reason, when the lease renewal comes up, instead of discussing the negative items from the past, the conversation should take a completely different tone and focus on the tenantâs business or financial condition, and their ability to pay going forward.
Everyone wants to talk about how they should receive a discount as a result of the soft real estate market. There is no argument the real estate market is soft, nor does it require much discussion to agree with your tenant. But that is not the crux of the conversation. The conversation as a concerned property manager and owner is that you have a viable tenant that can afford the rent on the property and that they will be there to pay in a timely fashion in the future.
The second key in maintaining good tenant relations is to make sure you are constantly in communication with your customer, whether that involves newsletters, e-mail notices and updates as it relates to their occupancy, or cards, thank you letters or best wishes for the holidays. Believe it or not, those items go a long way toward establishing a positive working relationship. If the tenant does not have the desire or need for communication back, it is important for the property manager or owner to be proactive in establishing and continuing this working relationship. Chocolates on Valentineâs Day, a
holiday card for the new year or even a simple visit by the management or owner to check in on their tenant and make sure everything is OK, are the basic steps which must be taken.
Knowledge is key in any negotiation and understanding the goals and objectives of the person or entity on the other side of the negotiating table is paramount in structuring a âwin-winâ conversation or transaction. Without good tenant relations and customer service, you as the property owner or management automatically put yourself at a deficiency or run the risk of jeopardizing your future relationship with your tenant. Being an informed, proactive, concerned and educated landlord will ease the strain of todayâs economy and produce better tenant relationships in the long run.
- Published in Real Estate
Silk Purse or Sow’s Ear: Navigating the Busted Deal Landscape
The real estate bust left the nation’s urban landscape littered with a plethora of deteriorating, unfinished projects. After sitting untouched for a couple years, some failed projects are finally getting a second chance as banks begin offering them to investors at steep discounts to clear their books and replenish capital reserves.
Often priced at 40 or 50 percent or less of the original note, broken projects may offer tremendous upside potential for investors willing to finish and hold them until the market turns. Upside can be particularly compelling in hard hit regions with high barriers to entry, such as California and South Florida.
City Walk, a seven-story, 252-unit condominium project in the heart of Oakland’s downtown redevelopment district, is a prime example. Wood Partners, a national apartment developer, purchased the project for $5 million two years after the previous developer, the Olson Co., abandoned the site, says Wood Partners attorney Stephen Ryan, a partner at the San Francisco law firm of Cox, Castle and Nicholson. About $70 million had already been invested in City Walk when Wood Partners acquired it, and the company is investing another $50 million to finish it as apartments.
Similarly, Cleveland-based Legacy Capital Partners acquired a 200-unit condominium-conversion project on the waterfront in St. Petersburg, Fla., for $9 million and invested $6 million, or $32,000 per unit, to finish renovating it to apartment standards. The project, which is now 90 percent leased, is generating income and conservatively valued at $21 million, according to Legacy Capital President David St. Pierre.
While both projects have high-yield profit potential, they were very risky at the time of acquisition, with all the problems inherent to busted deals.
When Wood Partners purchased City Walk, the project had literally sat covered with bubble-wrap for about two years. “They [Wood Partners] had to be willing to take a risk on something with no certainty all,” says Ryan, explaining there was no financing at that time, and there were liens and other issues. Additionally, construction had been exposed to the elements, so there was potential for environmental issues and deterioration in structural quality.
The project acquired by Legacy Capital was 100 percent vacant and looked like a war zone, says St. Pierre. He notes that the best use was to renovate it as apartments, but at the time the area’s apartment vacancy was at an all-time high.
These projects were successful because the new investors cleaned up legal issues in advance, developed a strategy that took advantage of everything going before, and changed the end use to reflect current market conditions.
Most failed projects require a new vision or new business plan to make them work. In converting City Walk as rentals, Wood Partners, for instance, was careful to work the redesign to stay within entitlements already approved. Similarly, when Resmark Equity Partners LLC, acquired The Madrone, a 180-unit condominium project in Hollywood formerly owned by John Laing Homes, the company rebranded the project The Avenue and repositioned it as luxury apartments. Architect Jonathan Watts, a principal at the Los Angeles design firm, the Cunningham Group, notes, however, that Resmark completed the project to condominium standards and may convert units back to for-sale product when the market turns.
But opportunities like these are scarce, according to Stephen Smith, ULI Commercial & Retail Council Silver Chair and principal and chief operations officer at Chicago-based Bryanston Realty Partners. “Even with the large supply of distressed properties you have to really work to find opportunities in this market,” he says, contending that financial institutions aren’t under pressure from regulators to take write downs to get properties off their books like in past down cycles.
“It’s a frustrating time for anyone anticipating taking advantage of market dynamics,” concurs St. Pierre. “This [current market] should be a perfect storm for bargains, but they [projects] aren’t coming to market or when they do there’s lots of problems and the bank only wants to sell the note, not foreclose and sell the asset.”Â
“We are seeing some [broken projects] go,” says Ryan Iwasaka, partner in the Los Angeles law firm, Greenberg Glusker. He notes that any movement in distressed assets is driven by a bank’s need for a cash infusion or to clean up the books due to pressure by bank regulators. “But banks are sitting on the projects that will command better prices when the market turns, and are unloading properties that won’t see those [high] values again.”
“The problem in California is projects were so over valued, no one knows what the actual price should be,” Iwasaka explains “They [lenders] aren’t willing to discount [well-located properties] to the level buyers are willing to pay, so it’s a stalemate. At the end of the day, buyers will win the argument,” he believes, “but
we just don’t know when it will happen. “Banks have a backlog of properties, and they’re not sure what to do with which,” notes Barry Saywitz, president of the Newport Beach, Ca., brokerage the Saywitz Company. “They’re cautious about write-down amounts and tend to deal with the biggest fire in front of their face, so it’s frustrating for investors trying to make a deal,” he adds. “Time is killing deals because banks can’t decide what to do and wait too long to get back to prospective buyers.”
“What we’re seeing now is banks dealing with large projects like shopping centers in one-off situations, but pooling good projects with bad ones, making buyers take them as a package deal,” Saywitz adds. In the end he agrees, “If the project is under water or there’s no income, the lender will have to take a haircut.”Â
Meanwhile, banks are deferring property maintenance or allowing new structures to deteriorate in the elements, then offering them for sale in “as is” condition, Smith points out. He advises caution in underwriting deals, with consideration of whether the project is viable or ill conceived from the start, and what it would take in upfront capital to make the project work.
The biggest challenge for investors is getting control of the property. However, control of the asset is essential to securing private equity partners, emphasizes financial consultant Steve Duffy, managing director of Moss Adams Capital LLC, and underwriting, therefore, should include everything that needs to be done to gain control.
While pricing of broken projects may be enticing, broker Brian Janak, senior associate in the Houston office of Marcus & Millichap, emphasizes the importance of thorough due diligence. “Some of these deals have a lot of hair
growing on them,” he warns, noting potential for unpaid taxes, liens or other issues that affect the title or the project’s viability.
Foreclosure may clean up the title, but is expensive and takes time. Duffy advises a “friendly foreclosure,” where investors work simultaneously with the original borrower and bank to avoid the high cost of a forced takeover in which the borrower is “fighting investors every step of the way.” In considering what to pay, Mark Weinstein, a Los Angeles developer who serves as court appointed receiver in foreclosure cases, emphasizes that pricing should reflect the cost of foreclosing and number of issues encumbering the property. He also stresses the need to be selective in choosing a receiver experienced at solving problems upfront and negotiating title policies that protect investors from surprises when the project is completed.
While conditions may vary by market, Janak points out that the basic real estate mantra of location, location, location still applies regardless of geography. He advises investors to avoid projects on the fringes unless they are income producing and/or priced at the value of the dirt. He says the opportunity in Houston is to buy location and manufacture yield by taking advantage of discounted construction pricing and temporary low interest rates to add value. Weinstein notes that the “sweet spot” for condominiums in Southern California is a price point that qualifies for a FHA mortgage, with a $417,000 ceiling.
No matter how bad the market, there are always good opportunities for someone. Saywitz notes that in this market, investors who can pay cash have the advantage. “But if you need to get a loan, that’s going to be difficult.”
- Published in Real Estate
Portfolio Management In The New Millennium
In the new millennium corporations will be looking for innovative ways to increase bottom line profits,control costs, and streamline processes.The continuing evolution of advanced technology, as well as continued corporate growth through expansion and acquisition,require corporations that have significant real estate portfolios to reevaluate how they monitor, maintain, and address their real estate issues. Many corporations have looked to outsource a number of functions related to their real estate portfolios. In addition to brokerage transactions, we may see a trend toward outsourcing lease administration, construction management,and strategic planning.
Brokerage services
With respect to brokerage services,today’s commercial real estate brokerage firm is far different from those of the past. In order for a corporation to successfully implement an outsourcing program, it will need to align itself with a brokerage vendor that has the capabilities to identify potential sites for new leases or relocations. Having a single point of contact is also imperative to create standardization for the corporation’s portfolio and its lines of communication to its operating entities and branches throughout the organization.
This process begins with the brokerage vendor’s understanding of the client’s business plans, its business issues as they relate to the real estate, and its goals and desires in the future. The brokerage vendor should have local market expertise and produce results in a timely fashion. The single point of contact should be the “quarterback,” coordinating within its own organization to ensure that the client’s goals and objectives are conveyed to each local market. A complete outsourcing of brokerage services should includeâbut not be limited toârelocations, lease renewals, expansions, disposition, subleasing, and acquisition services. It is imperative that a standardized process be formulated from the onset to ensure that as different requirements occur, the integrity of the process remains the same.
When in search of a real estate outsourcing vendor, a company should view its vendor as a business partner.The difference between a business partner relationship and that of contractual services varies greatly, not only in each party’s interpretation of the relationship but the implementation as well. Those companies that provide real estate services and view their relationship as a means to expand their own business, and those that view their client’s real estate as if it was their own, will have a tendency to apply a more thorough and creative approach to addressing real estate issues.
Those vendors who apply a transaction approach will typically be less concerned with the business implications of each transaction and more concerned with the micro issue of closing the transaction and collecting a fee. The relationship between a corporation and its real estate vendor needs to be a “win~win” situation for both parties. The vendor must view its role as a cost protection device for the corporation as well as implementing areal estate program consistent with the company’s overall business plan.
The outsource vendor’s results should be based upon not only the functional benefits to the corporation’s internal processes but the bottom line cost savings and client satisfaction received from each individual branch and operating entity. This business partner relationship should also serve as a customer relations function to each branch to ensure that the individual real estate requirements, needs, and desires are addressed.
Lease administration
The ongoing monitoring of lease expirations, operating expense increases, common area expenses, and other ancillary costs can become a cumbersome and people-intensive process. The constant changing and rollover of leases, combined with there locations and expansions within a given portfolio, must be attended to in order to maintain a firm control over real estate costs and strategically plan for the future.
When evaluating brokerage services,corporations should look to their real estate vendors to address how they may be able to assist in the lease administration aspect of the real estate program as well. Many real estate companies provide their own software programs and have the ability to customize an outsourcing program to address the lease administration portion of the process. Outsourcing this aspect of the process may result in lower real estate costs for the corporation and a greater sense of accountability for controlling the portfolio and its related costs. In some instances corporation shave been able to outsource the payment of rents to their landlords and eliminate the internal costs associated with the maintenance of that aspect of the real estate.
Construction Management
The overall real estate process does not end once a lease is signed or the commitment is made to relocate or expand a facility. Once the contract has been executed, someone must physically improve the property and also coordinate the physical relocation.There are a number of potential pitfalls that occur during the construction process that not only affect the functionality of the real estate process, but also the bottom line. It is imperative that construction schedules are adhered to and that a tight control over the construction costs is maintained. An outsourcing program can be structured to provide the vendor with incentives to ensure that these issues are addressed and that the corporation is not exposed to additional costs or time delays that will ultimately affect their business.
By outsourcing the construction management portion, a corporation will have the ability to employ individuals specifically designed to monitor and control the construction process for each of their locations. The additional sense of accountability and the structure of a results-oriented relationship should provide the corporation with a greater ability to control this aspect of the process and its related costs.
Strategic planning
Corporations should look to their real estate vendor to take a proactive role in providing cutting~edge technology and a creative approach to its own business plan. The application of demographic information and the analysis of a company’s workforce, client base, and growth of specific sectors of the industry should be applied to the real estate decision-making process. This application will help determine where specific sites should be located and how they relate to the company’s business plan in the future. Real estate leases are a financial commitment for extended periods of time and, as we all know, corporations’ business plans have a tendency to change and those changes ultimately affect how the real estate is utilized.
Conclusion
The value of outsourcing specific real estate functions should provide cost savings, functionality, standardization,access to cutting-edge technology, and increased expertise. Those corporations that are proactive in evaluating the costs and business benefits to creatively analyze how they maintain the real estate portfolios in the future, will be those that are least disrupted in the event of fluctuations in the economy o rthe real estate markets around the country. These corporations will provide themselves a greater ability to increase their overall profits and effectively manage their real estate portfolios.
Barry Saywitz is president of The Saywitz Company,a natonal commercial real estate brokerage and consulting firm headquartered in Newport Beach, California. He is also chairman of The CORE Network, a worldwide organization of real estate companies. He can be contacted at 949/9307500 or www.saywitz.com.
- Published in Real Estate
The art of lease restructuring
Itâs often said that a companyâs work force is its lifeblood, and if thatâs true then keeping
its real estate costs and facility rents down can be seen as the vital transfusion often
needed to keep the bloodstream flowing. In todayâs difficult economic times, it is
important for commercial tenants and business owners to look for ways to trim expenses
and cut costs to survive while the economy continues to remain in a state flux. Itâs safe
to say that every company, whether directly related to the real estate industry or not, has
been and is in the process of trying to figure out ways to run as lean and mean as
possible. These moves include personnel changes and lay-offs, consolidations,
revamping of expenses and compensation structures. However, many times there is a
simple solution that can avoid upsetting workflow balance while providing some key
relief to the bottom line: the skillful art of what is now commonly known as âlease
restructuring.â
With commercial vacancy rates nearing record highs and rents plummeting to lows not
seen since well before the start of this century, there is no doubt that now is not the
greatest time to be a landlord. However, as one side of the fence struggles the other can
flourish, and if there is a silver lining during these difficult economic times, it is that now
is a great time to be a tenant.
San Diego, like most markets around the country, has seen a significant drop in rental
rates triggered by high vacancies caused by consolidations, space give-backs and a
general lack of growth in the marketplace. This has created a situation where landlords
are forced to provide tenants with rent reductions and considerable concessions in the
form of free rent, improvement dollars and other allowances to entice tenants into their
buildings. Additionally, landlords will go to great lengths to keep existing tenants in good
standing from leaving, and will often be open to restructuring leases well in advance of
their expiration dates.
Many of todayâs tenants who signed longer-term leases years ago are left with the
uneasy feeling of knowing that they are paying much higher rates than their neighbor
Jeff Saywitz
who just moved in last week. While itâs true that timing is everything, it doesnât
necessarily mean you canât do something about it today. With that said, calling your
landlord and complaining about your situation will hardly garner you any sympathy, as
they have their own issues and, after all, you are contractually bound to pay the rents
you agreed to. However, more and more tenants today are seeking the services of
sophisticated tenant representation firms who are skilled in lease restructuring, resulting
in immediate savings for tenants, rather than having to wait for the timing of their lease
expiration to catch up with them.
Restructuring a lease, like any negotiation, really comes down to leverage. When a
tenant has time left on the lease, the natural assumption is that leverage is with the
landlord. He knows you canât pick up and move until the lease expires, and there is also
a considerable disruption to your business and costs associated with moving. While this
may be true, the savvy tenant can reverse this notion by conveying a sense of urgency,
combined with the uncertainty of the future and high costs to release the space if and
when the tenant does move.
For starters, it is important to make it clear that keeping things as they are and re-
addressing them as the lease expiration gets a little closer is not acceptable. Simply
asking to restructure early is not enough reason for it to be granted. Your landlord must
realize that not working with you now will negate any possibility of retaining you as a
tenant in the future. If your landlord senses there is a possibility of deferring this event,
then he will. Not only does he get to keep collecting a higher rent for a longer period of
time, but he also holds out hope that current market rates may increase as times goes
on.
In addition, you need to create a âwin/winâ so that your landlord will be inclined to work
with you. This typically requires some additional carrot, which usually comes in the form
of an additional lease term. It generally means adding to your current remaining lease
term. Simply offering up more term is not usually going to be enough. No landlord wants
to disrupt their current cash flow or reduce it, but the fear of having it vanish altogether
and the thought of spending three or four times more than that to reproduce it is where
the real leverage comes from.
One important thing to remember is that re-leasing costs in todayâs climate can be
astronomical. This is primarily due to the âdowntimeâ to find another tenant for the space.
With the vast glut of commercial space on the market, tenants looking to relocate have
far greater choices than ever before. The time it takes to lease a vacant space has also
increased significantly. In the past it might take three to four months to find a
replacement tenant, but that number today can be as high as two or three years,
depending on the submarket and the space. Add improvement costs that come with up-
fit for a new tenant along with marketing costs to re-lease the space, and even the most
discounted renewal rate potentially will be much more profitable than re-leasing the
space.
The trick to all of this, however, is to eloquently discuss lease re-negotiations without
flinching or insulting your landlord, while pointing out the benefits of restructuring the
lease sooner rather than later. Although it might not be their first choice, it is usually far
better than the alternative of having to re-lease the space in the future and the
uncertainty that goes with it. If handled properly, this process can result in significant rent
savings and/or additional concessions that immediately improve your companyâs bottom
line — which in todayâs climate could be the difference between success and failure.
- Published in Real Estate
Creative, Affordable Real Estate Solutions and The Purchase Partial Lease Back
A Creative Affordable Real Estate Solution for Owning Commercial Real Estate
As the economy changes, your company may still need new and/or additional facilities to not only upgrade systems and equipment, but for future expansion. In some markets, vacancy rates are in the single digits, and you may need to turn to build-to-suit facilities to accommodate expansion due to the lack of available space.
The ultimate cost to your company with build-to-suit facilities is a function of the price of land, cost of construction, and the cost of money available to you or your developer. In many cases, these costs are in excess of current market rents for existing product, and although it allows your company to expand, there is additional financial commitment required.
The Saywitz Company, a national commercial real estate brokerage and consulting firm based in Orange County, CA, was faced with several scenarios for clients looking to expand throughout California. Many of the markets in California, like others around the country, are extremely landlord oriented and available space is scarce while rental rates are climbing.
We’ve implemented a concept to accommodate our client’s expansion plans and control real estate costs called the Purchase Partial Lease Back (PPLB). The PPLB incorporates the concepts of build-to-suit, purchase, and leasing scenarios all into one transaction.
The dynamics of the marketplace, financial stability of your company, future projections for the market, and your company’s growth must all be considered in this transaction. We’re currently using the PPLB throughout California, and have recently employed it for our own real estate requirements and growth for our new headquarters office in Newport Beach, CA.The basic concept of the transaction is that you either purchase or construct a new facility to accommodate your company’s requirements. This new facility will be larger in size than your company’s immediate requirements in preparation for future company growth. Your company will then own the facility and lease back the portion of the facility you do not need immediately. The rental income that will be generated from your new tenant will offset in part, or in its entirety, your financial obligations for the new facility. This allows the flexibility to gradually grow into the facility while increasing your bottom line by reducing overall real estate costs.
The benefits of this transaction are:
Ownership, rather than renting â The benefits of ownership provide tax incentives to the principals of the company, and projected appreciation of the asset as a whole provides additional upside to the company.
Flexibility to control future growth â Your company can rent out the excess space for short- or long-term leasing to coincide with its future growth plans and gradually ease into the overall size of the building.
Bottom line cost savings â When financial analysis are performed on a build-to-suit, lease transaction versus the the PPLB, the overall expense can range from 30%-100% in bottom-line cost savings to your company. Additionally, the lease that is signed with the tenant for the excess space in the building will typically have annual increases and your mortgage will stay fixed for the length of the mortgage. In time, your monthly expense decreases, as rental income increases.
The risks of PPLB are:
Future down-turn in the real estate market â Although we are certainly on the up-cycle of the real estate market, should it take a downward turn, you may be left with an asset worth less than what you paid. However, as long as you use the facility, the cost will be cheaper than renting.
Ownership responsibilities â You are responsible for maintaining the facility and coordinating any issues with your own tenants. With the PPLB, your company is, in effect, the landlord. However, these risks can be alleviated by hiring a third party manager at a nominal cost.
Risk of finding a tenant â There are additional costs that may be incurred to you by having a portion of the facility remaining vacant for a period of time after construction or acquisition. This may alter the financial analysis and require additional up-front cost to be incurred until a tenant is found. However, in the typical case of the PPLB, this scenario requires a build-to-suit with new construction. In this case, your company will have a minimum of 6 to 12 months to market the property prior to the completion of the construction. Assuming this transaction is being structured in a market that has decreasing vacancies and increasing rental rates,there should be no difficulty in finding a tenant for new construction prior to the completion of the building.
As in any real estate transaction, there are risks and rewards. The risks with the PPLB are future stability of the real estate market, and the future business projections of your company. The rewards, however, will increase your bottom line performance significantly and control your future growth.As the pioneer of this new concept, The Saywitz Company has taken its own advice and has purchased a building in Newport Beach, CA for its headquarters. The firm implemented the PPLB to alleviate all costs associated with real estate. In effect, the company eliminated the rent line item on its balance sheet and acquired an asset in the process. We are currently negotiating several transactions in excess of 1,000,000 square feet employing this concept.
If your company fits the criteria for this transaction and employs a solid set of investment analysis combined with future growth projections, you will be able to either acquire or construct a new facility allowing better efficiency and use of space, along with technological change. You will be able to place an asset on your balance sheets rather than a rent expense and reduce your overall real estate costs significantly.
Barry Saywitz is president of The Saywitz Company, a National Real Estate Brokerage & Consulting Firm and is also chairman of The CORE Network, a Worldwide Organization of Real Estate Companies. For more information, please contact The Saywitz Company at 949-930-7500.
- Published in Real Estate
Southland Businesses Explore New Real Estate Option
As real estate markets around the country continue to tighten and as the rapid recovery and upswing of the commercial real estate cycle continues, many markets are experiencing vacancy rates in the single digits â which makes finding available product difficult for many tenants. In Southern California in particular, desirable properties often have multiple bidders, both for acquisition and for lease. In many sub markets there are even bidding wars for available space.
As the economy recovers and companies continue to expand, many users of commercial real estate find themselves in need of new and/or additional facilities to not only upgrade systems and equipment, but to meet future expansion needs as well. In many instances, tenants find themselves looking to build-to-suits to accommodate their expansions due to the lack of available product. These build-to-suits can come in the form of a developer constructing a new facility that the company would lease or buy at its completion. The ultimate cost to the user in this scenario is a function of the price of land, cost of construction, and the cost of money available to the user and/or developer. In many cases,these costs are in excess of current market rents for existing product and, although such an arrangement gives the user the ability to expand, additional financial commitment is required.
Exploring an Alternative Option
Recently, The Saywitz Company,a national commercial real estate brokerage and consulting firm head-quartered in Orange County, found itself facing several scenarios in which clients were looking to expand their operations throughout Southern California. However, like other areas around the country, many of the markets in Southern California are extremely landlord-oriented and, as a result, available product is scarce and rental rates continue to climb.
To accommodate its clients’ expansion plans and control real estate costs, the real estate firm implemented an innovative concept called the Purchase Partial Lease Back (PPLB). Essentially, the PPLB combines the concepts of both the build-to-suit, purchase, and leasing scenarios all into one transaction which goes something like this: the user will either purchase or construct a new facility to accommodate its requirements. However, because the company is uncertain about its growth rate and may not want to commit to additional cost, it will construct a facility that exceeds its immediate square footage requirements. The company then owns the facility and can lease back the portion of the facility that it doesn’t currently need to another tenant. The idea is that the rental income generated from the new tenant will offset â in part or in full â the company’s financial obligations for the new facility, thereby giving it the flexibility to gradually grow into the facility and reduce overall real estate costs.
Of course, the dynamics of the marketplace, the financial stability of the user, and future projections for the market and the user’s growth must all be considered in formulating this transaction.
Rewards and Risks
As in any real estate transaction,there are both rewards and risks associated with PPLBs. The major benefits include ownership, flexibility,and cost savings. First of all, owner-ship of a property provides tax incentives to the principals of the company,and projected appreciation of the asset as a whole offers an additional upside. Secondly, a PPLB arrangement gives the owner flexibility to control future growth. The user can rent out the excess space for short-or long-term leasing to coincide with its future growth plans and gradually ease into the overall size of the building. Finally, companies can realize significant cost savings. For example, when financial analyses are performed on a build-to-suit lease transaction versus the PPLB, the over-all expense of the latter can result in a 30 to 50% bottom-line cost savings to the company.
Another plus: the lease signed with the tenant for the excess space in the building will typically have annual increases, while the user’s mortgage will stay fixed for the length of the mortgage. In time, the monthly expense to the user decreases as his rental income increases.
Of course, as alluded to earlier, PPLB transactions are not without their risks. Such transactions are, for instance, vulnerable to future downturns in the real estate market. Although today we are certainly in the cycle of the real estate market, should the real estate market take a downward turn, the user may be left with an asset that could be worth less than what it paid for the property. However, as long as the user continues to utilize the facility, the cost will still be cheaper than renting.
Another potential negative to the PPLB is that the user must assume ownership responsibilities. The user is now responsible for maintaining the facility and resolving any issues with its tenant. After all, in this arrangement the user is, in effect, the landlord. While this “risk” can be alleviated by hiring a third-party manager to oversee those responsibilities, it is still an issue that must be considered.
A third risk relates to finding a tenant. As would be expected, additional costs may be incurred by the user if a portion of the facility remains vacant for a period following completion. This could certainly alter the financial analysis and require additional up-front costs until a tenant is found. It should be noted, however, that the typical PPLB involves new construction, giving the user a minimum of 6 to 12 months to market the property prior to its completion.
Assuming this transaction is structured in a market that has decreasing vacancies and increasing rental rates, there should be no difficulty in finding a tenant prior to completion of the building.
In summary, the risks involved with these transactions relate to the future stability of the real estate market and the business projections of the user. Should a company employ an entrepreneurial strategy to take advantage of the current real estate market, favorable lending practices, and increased rental rates,the rewards can increase the company’s bottom-line performance and give it control of its own destiny with respect to its real estate use.
Cases in Point
Several Southern California companies are already considering whether PPLB transactions are the way to go for their businesses. One Saywitz company client, for example, recently acquired a manufacturing/distribution facility in Oceanside to meet its expansion requirements. After a thorough analysis of the marketplace, executives realized that the increasing rents made it more expensive to occupy additional space than to actually own the property themselves. The PPLB afforded them the ability to not only acquire a larger property that will ultimately accommodate their future growth plans, but also provided an end result in which leasing out approximately 50% of the building will reduce overhead expenditures to 20 to 25% below the cost of leasing a similar facility. Since the company opened escrow on the property less than six months ago, the rental rates in that market have already increased 10 to 20%. The company expects the value of their property to increase in excess of $1 million within the next 12 months.
Another potential success story may be found in an international manufacturer and distributor of hair care products headquartered in L.A. County. The company’s current international headquarters consists of three buildings, but the firm is exploring the advantages of the PPLB. The preliminary analysis indicates a potential savings of $2-4 million over the next 5 years by employing this process.
Similarly, another manufacturer and distributor headquartered in L.A.County is exploring the possibility of constructing and owning a 450,000-square-foot facility to accommodate its new corporate headquarters and distribution needs. A facility of this size located in Los Angeles will allow the user to take advantage of economies of scale and significantly reduce construction costs by utilizing the size of the facility. The net mortgage cost in this case could be as much as 50% lower than leasing a comparable facility.
While each of these companies’ motivations and desires are different, one thing remains true for all: PPLBs not only allow them to control their own growth in the future but also offer the opportunity to reap the benefits of a rising real estate market and the tax benefits associated with ownership. In fact, it’s such an appealing concept that The Saywitz Company itself is practicing what it preaches: The company recently purchased its own building in Newport Beach for its headquarters.
The Bottom Line
The user who understands the risks and rewards associated with PPLB transactions and employs a solid investment analysis combined with future growth projections will be able to either acquire or construct a new facility that allows them to incorporate better efficiency and use of space, along with technological change. Such users will be able to place an asset on their balance sheets rather than a rent expense and significantly reduce overall real estate costs.
- Published in Real Estate
Barry Saywitz And The Commercial Real Estate Network
Being an entrepreneur is about envisioning a better way to do something, and then making the vision a reality. Sometimes, in the process, entrepreneurs create something new which becomes bigger than they could have imagined in their wildest dreams. Meet Barry Saywitz. “I’m not an entrepreneur who sat at home and thought up a great invention,” he says. “I took principles and concepts, and tried to expand on them and create a niche where I could be successful.”
Saywitz is founder and president of The Saywitz Company, a commercial real estate brokerage and consulting firm with 25 employees headquartered in Newport Beach. Recently, Saywitz was the youngest nominee on National Real Estate Investor Magazine’s list of the 40 most influential people in real estate underage 40.
Which means that he was only 26 when he got an entrepreneurial company off the ground during one of the worst real estate markets in recent history, and 27 when he started the CORE (Commercial Real Estate) Network, an I’ll help you-you help me umbrella organization pooling there sources of 80 plus commercial real estate firms with offices In more than 120 cities throughout the U.S.
Saywitz comes across as a wise 34-year-old, and maybe that’s because he’s achieved his success by dint of hard work and trial and error.He began his career as a commercial real estate broker in 1990 working for Howard Ecker and Company in Orange County. The office setup was Stone Age compared to today; three brokers shared two desks and a phone in an interior office of an executive suite no bigger than a closet. Although the early ’90s seem like recent history, the brokers had no computers to back them up, index cards were the high-tech tools of choice, and any pay they earned came from commission. Saywitz says, “It’s not a good feeling when you get down to your last couple of dollars. You don’t have 100 percent control over whether someone signs a deal.” Then, in 1992, the local real estate market hit bottom. At this not-so-opportune time, Saywitz became a partner in Howard Ecker, and in 1994 he bought the West Coast operations of the company and changed the name to The Saywitz Company.
The traditional method of building up business in commercial real estate has always involved exploiting personal connections. Saywitz thought there must be a better way to build a real estate business. “At the time,” he says, “I interviewed with other real estate brokerage companies throughout Southern California and asked them about their game plans. No one really had one in terms of developing business other than basing it on personal relationships. Since no one had a compelling plan, I decided to give it a try.” Because of the poor market conditions, Saywitz had chosen a difficult time to buy in. But he believed there had to be a process for cultivating and generating business other than playing golf. “When I started,” says Saywitz, “It was just me and a secretary. I’d go out in the morning and canvas buildings to generate prospects and leads. Then I would go back to the office and call on the leads, and later, in the evening, send out follow-up letters and information.”
“I taught myself how to use a computer and type out of necessity. I would go home at 2 a.m. and comeback to work at 6 a.m.” The more information Saywitz gleaned the more he saw that, especially at that time, it was a tenant’s market. So he concentrated on representing tenants. But he wasn’t content to stop at developing a focused process of target marketing to grow his client base.
As his company grew, he realized that in a typical real estate company, each broker functioned essentially as a company within a company. A broker was responsible for all aspects of his business; cultivating leads, turning them into clients, closing the transactions, and starting over. Saywitz found this inefficient. “I was strong in all these areas,” he says, “but operating like that was not a good use of my time. So I decided to structure my company more like a corporation.” The Saywitz Company has a research department to procure leads and prospects, a marketing department cultivating new business, brokers to work on the transactions, and a technical and administrative support department.
Saywitz’s next and most far-reaching innovation came when his company began to deal with large companies with a national presence. A client they were representing in Southern California would come to them and ask, “What do you know about Atlanta?” While general real estate knowledge is similar throughout the United States, there’s no substitute for expertise in the local market. Being a local Southern California company suddenly had its limitations, since they were competing with larger national real estate companies for business. So the Saywitz Company would engage the services of a local company in brokering the deal. But often, the local company they hooked up with would turn out to be part of a competitor company, or we would get some junior guy working on our deal. “In 1996,” says Saywitz, “I saw I needed to develop a platform to expand our business on a national basis. This would help us compete both nationally and locally, and help us give our clients what they needed. ”
Saywitz looked at other national organizations for ideas, hiring one of the former heads of real estate for Bank of America to analyze how other companies went about obtaining and servicing national business between cities. Saywitz’s model incorporated the best ideas from each. Together with a Los Angeles real estate firm, he developed the CORE network, a mutual benefit, nonprofit organization similar to the NFL in structure. He identified cities where he wanted an affiliate partner, starting with a list of 600 local entrepreneurial firms compatible with the CORE network’s goals. Clearly, he had struck a common nerve, as almost every single firm he contacted elected to participate. After a recent merger, CORE is now the sixth largest real estate brokerage organization in the country, conducting $17 billion in transactions in 2001, and Saywitz now serves as Chairman.
His next challenge was figuring out how to weather the ups and downs of the real estate market. “It’s difficult for those with monthly obligations to be in this type of industry,” says Saywitz. So he determined he would convert his success in the brokerage business into a solid monthly cash flow by purchasing multi-family investment properties with his profits. “It’s nice to be a landlord,” he says. The rent creates cash flow, which can supplement or offset the ups and downs in the brokerage business. Today, the Saywitz Company has a separate division, which buys multi-family apartment buildings near the beach, a construction crew that renovates them, and a division to manage them and handle the leasing.
Never afraid to try something new, Saywitz feels his biggest gamble so far was going out on his own during the worst economic times, with no real mentor or company structure to support him. “In facing all those first-time issues,” says Saywitz, “I made some mistakes. I try to share those with others so they don’t make the same mistakes.” His goal for The Saywitz Company is to grow to the point where it is a consistent force in the marketplace. By refusing to accept the status quo, Barry Saywitz has managed to create not only a strong local company with a wide national reach, but a nation wide network of affiliates working together to keep their clients happy. But don’t take your eyes off him yet…as young as he is, there are certainly more innovations to come.
- Published in Real Estate
- 1
- 2